Bible Strands

2 Chronicles 9:29

As for the rest of the acts of Solomon, from beginning to end, are they not written in the Records of Nathan the Prophet, in the Prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, and in the Visions of Iddo the Seer concerning Jeroboam son of Nebat?

Berean Standard Bible

Follow its threads on the canvas →

Study note

Setting — The Chronicler addresses his audience at the close of Solomon’s reign, placing the statement immediately before the summary of Solomon’s forty-year rule.

The words — The Hebrew שְׁאָר (she’ar) means “rest” or “remainder,” and כְּתוּבִים (ketuvim) literally means “written.” Combined with the rhetorical particle הֲלֹא (halo), the phrase functions as a confirmation that Solomon’s complete record is preserved in specific documents.

The thread — This literary formula parallels 1 Chronicles 29:29’s citation of Samuel’s records for David and aligns with 1 Kings 11:41’s reference to the Book of the Acts of Solomon. The Chronicler repeatedly grounds Israel’s royal history in prophetic sources like the writings of Nathan, Ahijah, and Iddo.

Why it lands — The text asks readers to acknowledge that the biblical narrative relies on external, now-lost archives rather than claiming exhaustive knowledge. It requires accepting the author’s claim that complete records exist without demanding their restoration or adding to them.

Drafted by a language model from the text, its original words and its cross-references, then checked against them. It can still be wrong: open the verse in the app to report it.

The Hebrew words

King James Version

Now the rest of the acts of Solomon, first and last, are they not written in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, and in the visions of Iddo the seer against Jeroboam the son of Nebat?

Cross-references

People named

SolomonJeroboamNathanNebatAhijahIddo