Bible Strands

Judges 13:23

But his wife replied, “If the LORD had intended to kill us, He would not have accepted the burnt offering and the grain offering from our hands, nor would He have shown us all these things or spoken to us this way.”

Berean Standard Bible

Follow its threads on the canvas →

Study note

Setting — Manoah’s wife responds to her husband’s declaration that they are doomed to die after seeing God. She speaks this immediately after the divine messenger vanishes, attempting to interpret the encounter through the evidence of God’s actions.

The words — The Hebrew לוּ (lu, "if") and חָפֵץ (cha.Fetz, "he had desired") establish her conditional logic. She contrasts God’s hypothetical will to destroy them with His actual acceptance of their burnt and grain offerings.

The thread — Her conclusion that God’s acceptance of offerings proves His intent to spare them aligns with the covenantal communication pattern in Psalm 25:14. The recognition of divine help and comfort in Psalm 86:17 similarly grounds faith in God’s demonstrated actions rather than abstract fear.

Why it lands — The text demands that a reader judge God’s intentions by observing His concrete deeds, such as accepting offerings and speaking directly. It directs attention to tangible evidence of favor instead of speculative catastrophe.

Drafted by a language model from the text, its original words and its cross-references, then checked against them. It can still be wrong: open the verse in the app to report it.

The Hebrew words

King James Version

But his wife said unto him, If the Lord were pleased to kill us, he would not have received a burnt offering and a meat offering at our hands, neither would he have shewed us all these things, nor would as at this time have told us such things as these.

Cross-references