Bible Strands

Numbers 27:4

Why should the name of our father disappear from his clan because he had no sons? Give us property among our father’s brothers.”

Berean Standard Bible

Follow its threads on the canvas →

Study note

Setting — The daughters of Zelophehad address Moses and the Israelite leadership, pleading for inheritance rights after their father’s death in the wilderness. They speak at a moment when tribal land allotment depends on male lineage, and their father left no sons.

The words — The Hebrew יִגָּרַע (yi.ga.Raʿ) literally means “will it be diminished” or “withdrawn,” paired with שֵׁם (shem), “name,” to express the fear of familial erasure. The phrase מִתּוֹךְ מִשְׁפַּחְתּוֹ (mi-tokh mishpachtô) specifies removal “from among his clan.”

The thread — The concern over a name vanishing from a clan echoes the inheritance petitions in Joshua 17:4 and the curse against generational erasure in Psalms 109:13. Moses’ intercession pattern in Exodus 32:11 parallels the daughters’ appeal to divine justice through leadership.

Why it lands — The text demands a legal resolution to a structural gap in inheritance law, prioritizing familial continuity over patrilineal default. It requires the reader to recognize how procedural appeals shape covenant community boundaries.

Drafted by a language model from the text, its original words and its cross-references, then checked against them. It can still be wrong: open the verse in the app to report it.

The Hebrew words

King James Version

Why should the name of our father be done away from among his family, because he hath no son? Give unto us therefore a possession among the brethren of our father.

Cross-references