Bible Strands

Romans 3:31

Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Certainly not! Instead, we uphold the law.

Berean Standard Bible

Follow its threads on the canvas →

Study note

Setting — Paul writes to a mixed Jewish-Gentile church in Rome, having just argued (3:21–30) that both groups are justified by faith apart from works of the law. He anticipates the objection that this conclusion renders the Torah irrelevant.

The words — καταργοῦμεν (katargoumen) means "do we render inoperative," a strong cancellation rather than a gentle setting-aside. The emphatic μὴ γένοιτο (mē genoito) is closer to "absolutely not" than the BSB's "certainly not."

The thread — Jesus says he came to fulfill, not abolish (Matthew 5:17), and Paul calls Christ "the end of the law" as its goal (Romans 10:4). Together these frame the law as something faith fulfills rather than something it cancels, while Galatians 2:21 guards against making the law the basis of righteousness.

Why it lands — It blocks two easy escapes: the legalist who clings to the law as a means of standing before God, and the antinomian who treats the law as obsolete. The reader must define what "upholding" looks like when it is not about earning righteousness.

Drafted by a language model from the text, its original words and its cross-references, then checked against them. It can still be wrong: open the verse in the app to report it.

The Greek words

King James Version

Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.

Cross-references