Bible Strands

Exodus 21:36

But if it was known that the ox had a habit of goring, yet its owner failed to restrain it, he shall pay full compensation, ox for ox, and the dead animal will be his.

Berean Standard Bible

Follow its threads on the canvas →

Study note

Setting — The Lord delivers this judicial ruling to Moses and the Israelites in the wilderness, immediately following the statute on two oxen fighting in Exodus 21:35. The passage addresses community leaders and landowners responsible for livestock management.

The words — The Hebrew נוֹדַע (no.Da') translates literally as "it is known," establishing the legal requirement of prior notice. The term נַגָּח (na.Gach) describes a specific goring habit that shifts liability from accident to negligence.

The thread — This liability framework extends to Exodus 21:35, where unknown animals trigger shared loss, and appears in Leviticus 24:17-21 regarding proportional restitution. The principle of known danger requiring restraint recurs in Deuteronomy 19:21 and Matthew 18:7.

Why it lands — The text demands owners compensate fully when they ignore a known risk, transferring the dead animal to their possession as part of the penalty. Readers must recognize that negligence incurs greater cost than mere accident.

Drafted by a language model from the text, its original words and its cross-references, then checked against them. It can still be wrong: open the verse in the app to report it.

The Hebrew words

King James Version

Or if it be known that the ox hath used to push in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.