Bible Strands

Job 35:15

and further, that in His anger He has not punished or taken much notice of folly!

Berean Standard Bible

Follow its threads on the canvas →

Study note

Setting — Elihu addresses Job directly, challenging the claim that God remains indifferent to human conduct. This occurs within Elihu’s third discourse, immediately following his argument that God’s justice functions beyond visible human reckoning.

The words — פָּקַד (pa.Kad) literally means “to visit or punish,” and יָדַע (ya.Da’) means “to know.” The syntax asserts that God neither actively punishes nor registers folly even when His anger is present.

The thread — The pattern of divine attention to sin appears in Psalms 89:32, where God visits transgression with a rod, and contrasts with the sudden trouble described in Job 4:5. The passage also aligns with the warning in Numbers 20:12 regarding the failure to acknowledge God’s holiness before the people.

Why it lands — The text requires readers to stop interpreting God’s silence as divine neglect or moral apathy. It demands that a reader accept God’s justice and awareness operate on a timeline and standard that defy human calculation.

Drafted by a language model from the text, its original words and its cross-references, then checked against them. It can still be wrong: open the verse in the app to report it.

The Hebrew words

King James Version

But now, because it is not so, he hath visited in his anger; yet he knoweth it not in great extremity:

Cross-references