Bible Strands

Romans 2:26

If a man who is not circumcised keeps the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?

Berean Standard Bible

Follow its threads on the canvas →

Study note

Setting — Paul addresses Jewish readers in Rome who rely on their covenant sign and Torah knowledge to judge others. He poses a rhetorical question to challenge the assumption that physical circumcision guarantees standing before God.

The words — ἀκροβυστὶα (akrobustia) literally means "uncircumcision," and δικαιώματα (dikaiōmata) refers to the "requirements" of the law. Paul uses these terms to contrast physical status with actual obedience.

The thread — The tension between physical markers and inward obedience appears in Romans 2:25 and 2:27. Colossians 2:11 and 1 Corinthians 7:18 address circumcision in terms of spiritual reality and personal calling, while Romans 8:4 shows the law's righteous requirement fulfilled in those who walk by the Spirit.

Why it lands — The verse demands that readers evaluate their standing before God based on obedience to His commands rather than external religious status. It forces a direct examination of whether one's life aligns with the law's actual requirements.

Drafted by a language model from the text, its original words and its cross-references, then checked against them. It can still be wrong: open the verse in the app to report it.

The Greek words

King James Version

Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

Cross-references