Bible Strands

Romans 3:7

However, if my falsehood accentuates God’s truthfulness, to the increase of His glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?

Berean Standard Bible

Follow its threads on the canvas →

Study note

Setting — Paul addresses Jewish interlocutors in Rome who question God’s justice in light of human sin. He poses this rhetorical challenge immediately after defending divine judgment in Romans 3:6 and before confronting the slanderous claim to do evil that good may result in Romans 3:8.

The words — δὲ (de) = however marks a sharp logical pivot, and ἀλήθεια (alētheia) = truth denotes the objective reality of God’s character that human sin paradoxically highlights.

The thread — The tension between human unfaithfulness and God’s faithfulness recurs in Romans 3:4, where Paul asserts that God must be true while every man is a liar. The same logical objection appears in Romans 9:19, and the fulfillment of divine words through human condemnation is noted in Acts 13:27.

Why it lands — The text forces the reader to confront the logical error of using divine glory as an excuse for personal sin. It demands a clear distinction between God’s sovereign truthfulness and human moral responsibility, rejecting any argument that treats condemnation as unjust.

Drafted by a language model from the text, its original words and its cross-references, then checked against them. It can still be wrong: open the verse in the app to report it.

The Greek words

King James Version

For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?

Cross-references